Make your own free website on Tripod.com
Home | Biblical Proclamation | MONOTHEISM: The Incomparable ONE | The BIBLE | The Laws of Noah - Universal Moral Standard | Christianity | Islam | Torah Observance | Israel - The Jewish People | For Israelites | What is Oral Law | What is Kabbalah? | Links / Online Resources | Books: MUST READS | Questions & Answers | Goal of this Site | DONATIONS

Path of Abraham

Are These The Only Options?

A popular Christian book proposes that everyone must choose one of three ways in which to understand Jes'us.  The book asks: Was he "Lord, Liar, or Lunatic?"  Indeed, this was the name of the book itself.  I ask, 'Who says these are the only options?' Is it possible he was Misunderstood, Misrepresented, or Mistaken?

When I take a serious reading of the books that are specifically holy to Christians, which they generally call the 'New Testament,' I am left with more than one possibility.  As I read the words from the lips of the one they consider Christ through Jewish eyes, the 'eyes' of one who holds the Torah (the Law of Moses) to be the Almighty's ultimate authority in guidance to man, I am left with a very different picture of this key figure of Christianity than what most Christians perceive.  Some of the statements which he is recorded to have said, most readers would simply read right over, not noticing their significance.  These same passages, when read by one who has even a little substantial knowledge of the historical faith of Israel, are full of meaning and implications.  Other statements of his that I've read seem to be going completely against the Law of Moses, in which case he would be a false prophet - see Deuteronomy 13.  However, these same troublesome passages, which most Christians think were intended to teach that the Law of Moses is no longer applicable, when read by someone who has knowledge of certain details of the Law of Moses, do not necessarily imply that this man from Galilee intended to teach that the Law of Moses is no longer applicable at all.  Passages like these can be understood in more than one way, even vastly different ways, depending on from what perspective the reader is reading.  I intend to give specific examples in the future.  [To be continued...]

Some books that further elaborate on examples of how this man from Nazareth may have been greatly misunderstood by later Christians can be found on the following sites:
 
JESUS THE PHARISEE ( By  Harvey Falk, an Orthodox Jew )
 
RABBI JESUS ( By Bruce Chilton, an  Episcopal priest )   <[WARNING: I have not read this book.]
 
SCHUELLERHOUSE <[WARNING: The books on this site do NOT represent mainstream Judaism.  I refer one to these books only that one may see further examples of how this individual, whom most of the world admires, may be greatly misunderstood.  All of these books are speculative.  I do not advise one to base his life on mere speculation, regardless of how much more likely one theory is than another.  The reality is that there is no way we can know with rational confidence exactly which teachings this man actually taught, and which teachings were superimposed onto his character.  We are obligated to make our lives inline with the Almighty’s Torah anyway.  We are never instructed in His Torah that we are to base our lives on a man, not even the Messiah – were he to have already come.  The truth is that there has been an almost 2,000 year break between Je'sus' original followers and we who are alive today.  After his original followers died, as admitted in early Catholic writings, massive corruption occurred among the early Christians.  As a result, there is no continued tradition of his original teachings going back in a direct line to His original followers.]

Enter supporting content here